Difference between revisions of "Page 149"
From FinnegansWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| (10 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
clusively [[confute]] this [[begging question]] it would be far fitter for | clusively [[confute]] this [[begging question]] it would be far fitter for | ||
you, if you dare! to [[hasitate]] to consult with and consequentially | you, if you dare! to [[hasitate]] to consult with and consequentially | ||
| − | attempt at my disposale of the same dime-cash problem elsewhere | + | [[attempt at]] my disposale of the same [[dime-cash]] problem elsewhere |
naturalistically of course, from the [[blinkpoint]] of so eminent a | naturalistically of course, from the [[blinkpoint]] of so eminent a | ||
| − | spatialist. From it you will here notice, Schott, upon my for the | + | [[spatialist]]. From it you will here notice, [[Schott]], upon my for the |
| − | first remarking you that the sophology of [[Bitchson]] while driven | + | first remarking you that the [[sophology]] of [[Bitchson]] while driven |
| − | as under by a purely dime-dime urge is not without his cashcash | + | [[as under]] by a purely dime-[[dime urge]] is not without his [[cashcash]] |
| − | characktericksticks, borrowed for its nonce ends from the fiery | + | characktericksticks, borrowed [[for its nonce ends]] from the [[fiery goodmother|fiery]] |
| − | goodmother Miss Fortune (who the [[lost time]] we had the pleasure | + | [[fiery goodmother|goodmother]] [[Miss Fortune]] (who the [[lost time]] we had the pleasure |
| − | we have had our little <I>[[recherché]]</I> brush with, what, Schott?) and | + | we have had our little <I>[[recherché]]</I> brush with, what, [[Schott?]]) and |
| − | as I further could have told you as brisk as your D.B.C. beha- | + | as I further could have told you as brisk as your [[D.B.C.]] beha- |
| − | viouristically <I>pailleté</I> with a coat of homoid icing which is in | + | viouristically <I>[[pailleté]]</I> with a coat of [[homoid]] icing which is in |
| − | reality only a done by chance ridiculisation of the whoo-whoo | + | reality only a [[done by chance]] [[ridiculisation]] of the whoo-whoo |
and where's hairs [[theorics of Winestain]]. To put it all the more | and where's hairs [[theorics of Winestain]]. To put it all the more | ||
| − | plumbsily. The speechform is a mere sorrogate. Whilst the qua- | + | [[plumbsily]]. The speechform is a mere [[sorrogate]]. Whilst the qua- |
| − | lity and tality (I shall explex what you ought to mean by this with | + | lity and [[tality]] (I shall explex what you ought to mean by this with |
its proper when and where and why and how in the subsequent | its proper when and where and why and how in the subsequent | ||
| − | sentence) are alternativomentally harrogate and arrogate, as the | + | sentence) are alternativomentally [[harrogate and arrogate]], as the |
gates may be. | gates may be. | ||
| − | Talis is a word often abused by many passims (I am working | + | [[Talis]] is a word often abused by many [[passims]] (I am working |
| − | out a [[quantum theory]] about it for it is really most tantumising | + | out a [[quantum theory]] about it for it is really most [[tantumising]] |
| − | state of affairs). A pessim may frequent you to say: Have you been | + | state of affairs). A [[pessim]] may frequent you to say: Have you been |
Latest revision as of 16:37, 29 January 2020
plight or, played fox and lice, pricking and dropping hips teeth, or wringing his handcuffs for peace, the blind blighter, praying Dieuf and Domb Nostrums foh thomethinks to eath; if he weapt while he leapt and guffalled quith a quhimper, made cold blood a blue mundy and no bones without flech, taking kiss, kake or kick with a suck, sigh or simper, a diffle to larn and a dibble to lech; if the fain shinner pegged you to shave his im- martial, wee skillmustered shoul with his ooh, hoodoodoo! brok- ing wind that to wiles, woemaid sin he was partial, we don't think, Jones, we'd care to this evening, would you? Answer: No, blank ye! So you think I have impulsivism? Did they tell you I am one of the fortysixths? And I suppose you heard I had a wag on my ears? And I suppose they told you too that my roll of life is not natural? But before proceeding to con- clusively confute this begging question it would be far fitter for you, if you dare! to hasitate to consult with and consequentially attempt at my disposale of the same dime-cash problem elsewhere naturalistically of course, from the blinkpoint of so eminent a spatialist. From it you will here notice, Schott, upon my for the first remarking you that the sophology of Bitchson while driven as under by a purely dime-dime urge is not without his cashcash characktericksticks, borrowed for its nonce ends from the fiery goodmother Miss Fortune (who the lost time we had the pleasure we have had our little recherché brush with, what, Schott?) and as I further could have told you as brisk as your D.B.C. beha- viouristically pailleté with a coat of homoid icing which is in reality only a done by chance ridiculisation of the whoo-whoo and where's hairs theorics of Winestain. To put it all the more plumbsily. The speechform is a mere sorrogate. Whilst the qua- lity and tality (I shall explex what you ought to mean by this with its proper when and where and why and how in the subsequent sentence) are alternativomentally harrogate and arrogate, as the gates may be. Talis is a word often abused by many passims (I am working out a quantum theory about it for it is really most tantumising state of affairs). A pessim may frequent you to say: Have you been
