Difference between revisions of "Page 109"
From FinnegansWiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| (7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Luckily there is another [[cant]] to the [[questy]]. Has any fellow, of | Luckily there is another [[cant]] to the [[questy]]. Has any fellow, of | ||
the [[dime a dozen]] type, it might with some profit some dull even- | the [[dime a dozen]] type, it might with some profit some dull even- | ||
| − | ing quietly be hinted<STRIKE> | + | ing quietly be hinted <STRIKE> </STRIKE> has any usual sort of [[ornery josser]], flat- |
chested [[fortyish]], faintly [[flatulent]] and given to [[ratiocination]] by | chested [[fortyish]], faintly [[flatulent]] and given to [[ratiocination]] by | ||
| − | [[syncopation]] in the [[elucidation]] of complications,of his greatest | + | [[syncopation]] in the [[elucidation]] of complications, of his greatest |
[[Fung Yang]] [[dynasdescendanced]], only another the son of, in fact, | [[Fung Yang]] [[dynasdescendanced]], only another the son of, in fact, | ||
ever looked sufficiently longly at a quite everydaylooking [[stamped addressed envelope|stamped]] | ever looked sufficiently longly at a quite everydaylooking [[stamped addressed envelope|stamped]] | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
self under its flap. Yet to concentrate solely on the literal sense or | self under its flap. Yet to concentrate solely on the literal sense or | ||
even the psychological content of any document to the sore | even the psychological content of any document to the sore | ||
| − | neglect of the enveloping facts themselves [[circumstantiating]] it is | + | neglect of the [[enveloping facts]] themselves [[circumstantiating]] it is |
just as hurtful to sound sense (and let it be added to the truest | just as hurtful to sound sense (and let it be added to the truest | ||
taste) as were some fellow in the act of perhaps getting an intro | taste) as were some fellow in the act of perhaps getting an intro | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
the facts of feminine clothiering are there all the time or that the | the facts of feminine clothiering are there all the time or that the | ||
feminine fiction, stranger than the facts, is there also at the same | feminine fiction, stranger than the facts, is there also at the same | ||
| − | time, only a little to the rere? Or that one may be separated from | + | time, only a little to the rere? [[Or that one may be separated from the other|Or that one may be separated from]] |
| − | the other? Or that both may then be contemplated simultaneously? | + | [[Or that one may be separated from the other|the other]]? Or that both may then be contemplated simultaneously? |
Or that each may be taken up and considered in turn apart from | Or that each may be taken up and considered in turn apart from | ||
the other? | the other? | ||
Latest revision as of 10:52, 30 March 2014
Luckily there is another cant to the questy. Has any fellow, of the dime a dozen type, it might with some profit some dull even- ing quietly be hintedhas any usual sort of ornery josser, flat- chested fortyish, faintly flatulent and given to ratiocination by syncopation in the elucidation of complications, of his greatest Fung Yang dynasdescendanced, only another the son of, in fact, ever looked sufficiently longly at a quite everydaylooking stamped addressed envelope? Admittedly it is an outer husk: its face, in all its featureful perfection of imperfection, is its fortune: it ex- hibits only the civil or military clothing of whatever passion- pallid nudity or plaguepurple nakedness may happen to tuck it- self under its flap. Yet to concentrate solely on the literal sense or even the psychological content of any document to the sore neglect of the enveloping facts themselves circumstantiating it is just as hurtful to sound sense (and let it be added to the truest taste) as were some fellow in the act of perhaps getting an intro from another fellow turning out to be a friend in need of his, say, to a lady of the latter's acquaintance, engaged in performing the elaborative antecistral ceremony of upstheres, straightaway to run off and vision her plump and plain in her natural altogether, pre- ferring to close his blinkhard's eyes to the ethiquethical fact that she was, after all, wearing for the space of the time being some definite articles of evolutionary clothing, inharmonious creations, a captious critic might describe them as, or not strictly necessary or a trifle irritating here and there, but for all that suddenly full of local colour and personal perfume and suggestive, too, of so very much more and capable of being stretched, filled out, if need or wish were, of having their surprisingly like coincidental parts separated don't they now, for better survey by the deft hand of an expert, don't you know? Who in his heart doubts either that the facts of feminine clothiering are there all the time or that the feminine fiction, stranger than the facts, is there also at the same time, only a little to the rere? Or that one may be separated from the other? Or that both may then be contemplated simultaneously? Or that each may be taken up and considered in turn apart from the other?
